Online Desk: Case involving £190 million is only the visible tip of a much larger and more alarming narrative. While the details of this specific case are widely known and even acknowledged by some of Khan’s defenders with ifs and buts, underlying issue extends far beyond. It lies within a mindset that has increasingly corrupted the system, polluting it to an unbearable extent.
PTI’s financial dealings, particularly the foreign funding and prohibited funding case, further underscore these concerns. Documented evidence suggests funding from India and Israel, raising serious questions about national loyalty. PTI’s attempts to delay proceedings rather than address allegations only deepened suspicions. Accepting foreign funding is unacceptable, but receiving funds from hostile nations like India and Israel is particularly alarming. PTI has yet to provide satisfactory answers, further compounded by questions surrounding donations for Shaukat Khanum Hospital.
Beyond financial matters, PTI’s approach to legislative and constitutional issues has also drawn criticism. During the no-confidence motion, this party demonstrated blatant disregard for constitutional norms. This behaviour highlights PTI’s willingness to prioritize political ambitions over legal principles. Similarly, Khan’s participation in by-election campaigns, despite regulations prohibiting state officials from doing so, reflects his disregard for the rule of law.
The £190 million case epitomizes this pattern of behaviour. It highlights not only financial corruption but also conflict of interest and abuse of power. Khan and his aide, Shahzad Akbar, secured federal cabinet approval for this matter by presenting a sealed envelope—a move unprecedented in its audacity. This incident exemplifies the misuse of authority during Khan’s tenure.
These incidents collectively reveal a troubling picture of PTI and Imran Khan’s approach to governance. Key conclusions include: (i) Distinction between lawful and unlawful holds no significance for Khan and PTI. (ii) He unapologetically employ any means, ethical or unethical, to achieve his goals. (iii) The constitution and laws are disregarded whenever they conflict with personal or political ambitions. (iv) PTI provides ample space for corrupt individuals to thrive within its ranks. (v) National interest and loyalty are secondary to the party’s objectives, even if it means seeking support from hostile nations.
Imran Khan’s slogans of accountability and transparency appear to have been tools to discredit opponents rather than genuine principles. He positioned himself above morality and legality, pursuing ambitions unchecked by ethical considerations. However, divine justice often serves as the ultimate equalizer. The verdict in the £190 million case may remind Khan—and others—that those who dig pits for others often find themselves ensnared within.
